1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,880
Let me begin by congratulating
you. Thank you. You have

2
00:00:02,880 --> 00:00:06,560
a very impressive background. I
look forward to our discussion.

3
00:00:06,560 --> 00:00:10,240
You're probably not going to be
surprised. It's going to be very Alaska

4
00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:13,360
specific. We have a lot of
unique Alaska issues that a lot

5
00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:18,480
of judges sometimes miss.
I'm looking forward to talking

6
00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:21,760
about that.

7
00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:24,560
Congrats again. You have a very
impressive background for a

8
00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:27,520
whole host of reasons. Hello,
Alaska. I just came out of a

9
00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:31,200
meeting with Judge Amy Coney
Barrett, President Trump's

10
00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:35,020
nominee to be on the U.S.
Supreme Court. It was a really

11
00:00:35,020 --> 00:00:39,100
productive meeting, almost 45
minutes with her. We covered a

12
00:00:39,100 --> 00:00:45,580
bunch of topics. She's clearly
a thoughtful and

13
00:00:45,580 --> 00:00:50,140
intelligent jurist with many
credentials to her name.

14
00:00:50,140 --> 00:00:53,020
Some of the topics we
covered right at the outset: the

15
00:00:53,020 --> 00:00:56,540
role of a judge on the federal
judiciary, something I believe,

16
00:00:56,540 --> 00:01:00,300
and she agreed with me, it's
the judge's job to interpret

17
00:01:00,300 --> 00:01:04,520
the law, not to legislate. From
the bench, I think she was in

18
00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:09,080
full agreement on that. A lot
of our discussion focused on

19
00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:12,760
Alaska specific issues. I
talked about how unique our

20
00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:17,400
state was, but also how there
are many unique, complicated

21
00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:22,360
laws, such as the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act and ANILCA

22
00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:27,640
the Trans Alaska Pipeline Act,
even the Tax Act of 2017,

23
00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:31,400
which has a whole section on
the opening of ANWR. We went

24
00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:36,820
into depth about how federal
courts often misinterpret these

25
00:01:36,820 --> 00:01:40,260
very important laws for our
state, which could do huge

26
00:01:40,260 --> 00:01:44,420
damage to Alaska. So I told her
to keep an eye on these kinds of

27
00:01:44,420 --> 00:01:47,140
cases and then we went into
depth on the

28
00:01:47,140 --> 00:01:51,460
Sturgeon versus Frost case as
an example of lower courts, in

29
00:01:51,460 --> 00:01:54,660
this case, the Ninth Circuit
really misinterpreting federal

30
00:01:54,660 --> 00:01:57,620
law. Fortunately, the Supreme
Court in two different

31
00:01:57,620 --> 00:02:03,060
opinions finally got ANILCA
and Alaska right in the

32
00:02:03,060 --> 00:02:06,400
Sturgeon case. I respectfully
gave her this case and asked

33
00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:10,560
her to read it. We talked a lot
about the Second Amendment. She

34
00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:16,320
is a strong defender of the
Second Amendment. There was a

35
00:02:16,320 --> 00:02:21,760
Seventh Circuit case in which
she wrote a dissent that to me

36
00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:26,080
is one of the most powerful
dissents that I've read on

37
00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:30,400
the Second Amendment and the
importance of it. I would

38
00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:32,880
mention to Alaskans if
they're interested in it and we

39
00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:36,300
can make sure you know what
case that is to take a look at

40
00:02:36,300 --> 00:02:40,460
it to read it. We had a deep
discussion also on the issue

41
00:02:40,460 --> 00:02:46,700
of the power and limitations of
federal agencies, administrative

42
00:02:46,700 --> 00:02:49,740
agencies. She had written an
opinion on limiting the power

43
00:02:49,740 --> 00:02:53,500
of the Waters of the United
States (Rule) that I thought was very

44
00:02:53,500 --> 00:02:56,780
important and we had a long
discussion on that as well.

45
00:02:56,780 --> 00:02:59,660
We covered a bunch of other topics
as well, but I would say I'm

46
00:02:59,660 --> 00:03:03,740
certainly looking forward to
seeing more of her views as the

47
00:03:03,740 --> 00:03:08,220
Judiciary Committee hearings kick into gear, but

48
00:03:08,220 --> 00:03:11,580
overall, it was an important
meeting today and I think she

49
00:03:11,580 --> 00:03:17,500
came away with a sense of
just how important and unique

50
00:03:17,500 --> 00:03:20,300
many of the federal laws that
come before the U.S. Supreme

51
00:03:20,300 --> 00:03:25,980
Court that relate to Alaska and that
was my goal today.

